[newzjunkey]

It’s published in an “open access” journal, not one of the traditional peer reviewed journals.

[ChessExpert]

“Peer reviewed” may soon have the credibility of “fact checked.”

[Political Junkie Too]

It’s published in an “open access” journal, not one of the traditional peer reviewed journals.

Isn't that like saying it was published in the New York Post and not the New York Times?

The question is whether it legitimately peer-reviewed or not?

-PJ