Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76

From Wikipedia...

“She ruled in favor of Donald Trump on September 5, 2022, and surprisingly enjoined the Department of Justice from using the materials seized from Donald Trump’s home in any criminal investigation, an unexpected move which has no precedence in the law.”

Sounds like an indictment, if there is one, will be long in coming.


65 posted on 09/05/2022 10:03:02 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aquila48

Nana Nana Nah!


70 posted on 09/05/2022 10:14:52 AM PDT by magua (It's not racism, it's just that thisBecause it’s being reported that a lot of this started in 2015.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: aquila48

“She ruled in favor of Donald Trump on September 5, 2022, and surprisingly enjoined the Department of Justice from using the materials seized from Donald Trump’s home in any criminal investigation, an unexpected move which has no precedence in the law.”

Perhaps because having the FBI raid a former president’s home has no precedence in the law.


83 posted on 09/05/2022 10:25:32 AM PDT by Flick Lives (FJB and the corrupt FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: aquila48
an unexpected move which has no precedence in the law.

There's "no precedence" for a judge refusing to allow a prosecutor to use seized evidence? What kind of cr@p is this?

91 posted on 09/05/2022 10:28:38 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson