Are you accusing me of “doxxing” you? If so, please provide written proof.
You see, ladies and gentlemen, this appears to be the problem with all Q theorists. Here is the example of twisting words like pretzels.
This lovely poster stated in her first response to me while I was answering a question proffered by someone else that I had been outed. So I asked told her I had been doxxed. Did she support that someone else had violated the rules od the forum or perhaps she encouraged ir. I never specifically accused her od anything. I did ask a simple question. Was she in support of this illegal and forum rule violating activity. Her language suggested it.
You see. The poster cannot answer a question instead accuses me and requires me to give written proof of something i never said. But this is how Q theorists work. Twist the language. Feign being indignant and lie about the facts
This is a wonderful example of how it’s done by Q theorists.
Oh since you have made a diagnosis on one of your earlier posts why don’t you put in writing support of what you have said.
Good for the goose and all…
Good evening.