[conservative98]

a case for why this search warrant was not only essentially morally wrong, but legally wrong," he said.

we aint got time for morals and the law.

[bigbob]

Probably already been put to a DC grand jury, and will be rendered moot after an indictment is issued.

[bigbob]

Probably already been put to a DC grand jury, and will be rendered moot after an indictment is issued.

[Libloather]

Any update on the Hunter investigation?

[SmokingJoe]

One of President Trump's attorneys handling the FBI Mar-a-Lago raid case told Fox News the Justice Department appears to be suddenly “efficient” at processing cases, after they claimed to have already filtered the documents they procured

Yet they claim they have not been able to process the Hunter Biden laptop after having control of it since 2019.

[joshua c]

that was quick

have they even turned on hunter’s laptop?

[convoter2016]

Isn’t this the same FBI that told local agents not to investigate the Hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election? Now they’re in such a hurry to do their own “special master” to separate possible lawyer client privileged information from the rest of the documents seized in the Mar-a-Lago raid.

[MAGAthon]

- “This is the first knowledge we had about their findings on attorney-client privilege,” Trusty said. -

and all the while while this is ongoing!

Trump v. Clinton et al
https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-trump-v-clinton-et-al-1164545

23 Aug: MSN: Newsweek: Judge in Trump Raid Should Explain Recusal in Clinton Case: Ex-Prosecutors
by Katherine Fung
Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart’s recusal from former President Donald Trump’s RICO lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and others has become a major talking point among Trump’s attorneys and supporters, who have cast doubt over Reinhart’s ability to sign off on the search warrant for Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home...

However, the code does not require judges to specify exactly why they believe their impartiality could be questioned. So, Reinhart’s recusal does not provide any information as to why he disqualified himself in Trump v. Clinton et. al.
“There’s a tremendous lack of transparency about the reasons [for recusal],” former federal prosecutor Shanlon Wu told Newsweek. “It’s opaque, it’s a black box.”...

Neama Rahmini, a former federal prosecutor, said that from some of Reinhart’s previous statements, it seems like the perception of bias caused him to recuse himself. If the bias was against Trump, Rahmini said, “logic would suggest that he should recuse himself in both cases.”...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-in-trump-raid-should-explain-recusal-in-clinton-case-ex-prosecutors/ar-AA10Z6w2

[tennmountainman]

Of course it does. Who would “trust” anything DOJ or FBI says?
Appoint the Special Master.

[bitt]

P

[lurk]

Certainly the Feds are using their own special deck of cards in this game.