Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HYPOCRACY

Hypersonic missiles are meant to be able to maneuver at high speeds to make interception by anti-missile batteries (like the Patriot) ineffective. Their high speed makes response time minimal. Ballistic missiles follow an arching path, which is relatively easy to track and defend if you have the technology. Cruise missiles fly extremely low and slow, and depend on terrain avoidance maneuvers to avoid radar. The US has developed, and is starting to deploy directed energy weapons (lasers) to counter hypersonic missiles. We already have some in the field being tested on ships, and on vehicle sized platforms. The challenge is to shrink the size and control the heat, but we have supposedly overcome that by operating several lasers in tandem on a sort of daisy chain so that each smaller laser dissipates heat much better than one large laser.


46 posted on 08/19/2022 6:59:47 AM PDT by Republican Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Republican Extremist

From what I’ve read about the energy weapons, they’re the real deal. I suppose you have to be in sight line though. Unless they are deployed on satellites.

We should just rebuild Tesla’s death ray and destroy a Chinese empty city to let them know we mean business.


47 posted on 08/19/2022 7:04:41 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson