To: Mark17
I thought he had already won a ton of money.
The amount of the settlements has never been published. One can hope.
Anyway, I guess all these A holes ever have to say, is that it was our opinion, and that makes it ok.
The reason Sandman was offered a settlement on the prior claims is that the video was selectively edited to make him look bad. That is a deliberate act that shows 'malice'. An 'opinion' that shows malice, along the lines of "I hated him because he was wearing a MAGA hat" may be grounds for a libel suit. The key, in US law, is that the plaintiff has to be able to prove that the defendant acted with actual malice toward him. Most opinions (in this case, that he was blocking the ahole with the drum) are not necessarily (and therefore not legally) signs of malice.
20 posted on
07/27/2022 5:56:21 PM PDT by
Phlyer
To: Phlyer
Most opinions (in this case, that he was blocking the ahole with the drum) are not necessarily (and therefore not legally) signs of malice. But we KNOW they had malice. 🤪
39 posted on
07/27/2022 7:17:07 PM PDT by
Mark17
(Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson