Posted on 07/22/2022 8:41:26 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Nazi riots in her yard must be starting to get to Barrett. That’s too bad.
The Truth is that we were hoodwinked and that Barrett was a liberal all along. A horrible choice. Calling her a conservative is an absolute joke.
she did her job with the Roe Wade overturn and the CCW case from NY. We are not going to get 100% decisions on our side. Take the win when it happens.
You named one. You will have a hard time finding any more.
She is not a liberal in a billion years. We can call her something else.
And what do you base that upon? That she agreed to put a stay on a Biden policy?
“The Nazi riots in her yard must be starting to get to Barrett. That’s too bad.”
Nah, she’s just a coward.
“she did her job with the Roe Wade overturn and the CCW case from NY. We are not going to get 100% decisions on our side. Take the win when it happens.”
Except she screwed all us Healthcare workers that don’t want the clot shot.
The headlines are all very deceptive. You are left to figure it out from the context. From the article:
“The interesting points of the ruling include the fact that conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the three liberal justices.” (That means 4)
So Barret was on the losing side. She wanted Biden to win. So no she did not agree to put a stay on the Biden’s policy. At least that is how I read it.
Barret has been on the liberal side in most all of her rulings.
You better check again.
All these comments yet I don't see one that addresses whatever the question being decided was. The article doesn't either. Just who "wins". The court doesn't set policy. It decides legal questions that come before it. So what was the question? How do you know who was right or who was wrong if you don't even bother to think about it?
Ah. So you don’t understand how USSC stays work, nor their process for accepting a case. Fair enough.
The Supreme Court follows what is called, ‘The Rule of Four’. These things require four Justices to decide to hear a case, and they will issue a “writ of certiorari”.
Initially, a request for certification is submitted to one Justice, based upon which Court of Appeals the case came through (or other jurisdiction). That Justice will determine whether or not to apply a stay, and then see if other Justices want to hear the case. The point of this rule is to not let a coalition of five Justices to dominate the agenda.
After four Justices agree to hear a case, they stop counting - though sometimes this takes a long time and everyone gets in on the discussion as to whether to take the case. If the case is accepted quickly, usually fewer Justices will have weighed in. In the case of Dobbs, the USSC took several months and more than a dozen conferences before deciding to accept the case.
Especially in cases taken quickly, it says nothing at all about the other five, who may oppose, may agree, or may even not have been asked; much less whether the four wanted to hear the case for the same reason.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/certiorari
“Abdullah Hasan, a White House spokesperson” -— They sure seem to like foreigners at the White House.
She was on the right side of the Remain in Mexico policy.
Roberts and Kavanaugh, unfortunately, were not.
And on the right side of the EPA slapdown.
Well that makes a difference in this case. Sadly not one of the articles on this did a good job of explaining what this is. But am I understanding that the court hearing this case is a chance for Biden to win. And that if the case was not heard then Biden would already be the loser via a lower court?
Still makes me wonder what ACB up to. Several times she has saddened me by taking the liberal side.
Barrett has/had a little too much “social worker” in her personality for me to trust her anyhow. So no surprises.
Like i matter to ACB, haha.
This isn’t a surprise.
The SCOTUS is now just a rubber stamp for Deep State.
It decides what Deep State tells it to decide.
Barret doesn’t want to be called the r world
I, for one, welcome our 80 IQ black female overlords.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.