Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan

It seems to me that Rorke’s Drift was more of just a footnote to the Isandlwana (Isandhlwana?) battle prior to the Rorke’s Drift action. My guess is that Isandlwana gets historically short changed because of the outcome. The Brit’s don’t like to be reminded of when they got their butt’s kicked.


32 posted on 07/10/2022 10:29:01 AM PDT by Spok (Don’t pee down my leg and tell me it’s raininqg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spok

The Battle of Rorke’s Drift blunted and ended The Zulu’s ability to clear out the British from their land. The Zulus had to stop and clear this position, wasting time and energy they could have used to ambush Lord Chelmsfords relief column. Nowadays we call that blunting thier operational reach.

After Rorke’s Drift, the Zulu lost the initiative they gained at Ishadalwana.


65 posted on 07/10/2022 4:47:27 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson