This isn’t an ideological or theological solution, this is a set of circumstances requiring a pragmatic approach where neither party lives in a vacuum. Sorry, but no-ones rights are absolute when they impinge on someone elses rights.
“Sorry, but no-ones rights are absolute when they impinge on someone elses rights.”
——
OK, so a baby’s right to life mustn’t impinge on the mother’s right for convenience, for not having to bother with carrying the child until she can give it up for adoption. For a young man having to pay child support. That terrible terrible inconvenience of pregnancy for 9 months versus a life of 60, 70, 80 years and the potential children and grandchildren of the murdered baby if it had been allowed to live! The life to be lived, things accomplished, love given..vs the right to not be inconvenienced for 9 months
Ok, THOSE rights, of course they are equal in value. Riiiiight….( hopefully/ sarc not needed!)