Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Why? Justice Thomas doesn't think so, as he pointed out in his written concurrence. Thomas didn't even discuss stare decisis at all in his concurrence.
358 posted on 06/24/2022 11:17:53 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Thomas didn't even discuss stare decisis at all in his concurrence.

"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (THOMAS, J.concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents have generated."

What is stare decisis but established precedent?

360 posted on 06/24/2022 11:33:17 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson