And McConnell and Cornyn will still be in “leadership.” Does it really make a difference if they have a D or R behind their name if you still get D policies? Just skip the Senate vote on the ballot. There is no reason to give the Senate to the Republicans.
And McConnell and Cornyn will still be in “leadership.” Does it really make a difference if they have a D or R behind their name if you still get D policies? Just skip the Senate vote on the ballot. There is no reason to give the Senate to the Republicans.
I very much dislike the thought of McConnell and Cornyn continuing in leadership positions after the mid-terms and wish the members would throw them out of their lofty positions and include McCarthy in that bath-water they are throwing out!
However, there will always be a reason to put ANY Republican in the Senate, yes even Oz, Walker, Mitch, Collins, etc and that is the Supreme Court. We can not risk allowing a Democrat President and a Democrat-run Senate to put liberal judges on the bench. The one good thing McConnell has done is in keeping Merrick Garland and every day we see how stopping Secretary Garland off the Court was a brilliant piece of political leadership!
I understand that sentiment. I don't agree with it, but I understand it. Know this though: John Fetterman will be the most liberal, most thoroughly Marxist Senator any state has ever elected, and he is deceptively clever about both hiding it and selling Marxism to the masses. You sit on your hands and let him walk into office, he will find a way to stick around and spread his ideology. He will become a far bigger problem for the future of the nation than six years of a celebrity (who will probably tire of the job after one term anyway).