Again, you can give up on trying to undo the cheat without giving up on prosecuting the cheaters.
And, as a software engineer, I can tell you that details like that matter to the many engineers and programmers in Brooks' district. Before we get mad at somebody for saying the wrong thing, you can't just tell me your summary of what he said. We don't need your summary, we need the specifics and we can do our own summarizing because we're used to political talk being full of false summaries. Look at how many times the left has done the same thing to Trump: summarizing his "controversial" "racist" statements without telling us exactly what Trump said so that we can see he didn't say anything at all controversial or racist.
Forgive me before I believe a summary of Brooks from the campaign of a girl who made her career working for Shelby and has lots of GOPe PAC groups supporting her. At the risk of sounding like John Travolta talking to Brent Spiner in Phenomenon, I need specifics, Bob, specifics.
I agree with everything you say and I wasn’t upset by whatever Brooks said at the rally (I’m not even sure what he said or didn’t say).
I was just responding to a FReeper who presented two options for what Brooks could have said: A) deny the election was stolen B) acknowledge it was stolen but forget about it and move on.
I didn’t like the sound of either, so I was offering a third one: C) acknowledge the election was stolen but DON’T move on. Keep fighting to uncover the truth.
Maybe that’s what he did say - if so, good for him.