Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

She is not quoted as saying she “agreed” that the election was not stolen. She is quoted as saying that she “accepted” the results of the election because Bill Barr asserted that it was not stolen and she respects him. It could simply mean that she decided not to be involved in efforts to overturn the election because Bill Barr, whom she respected, didn’t want to participate.


27 posted on 06/09/2022 9:55:10 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Piranha
She is not quoted as saying she “agreed” that the election was not stolen. She is quoted as saying that she “accepted” the results of the election because Bill Barr asserted that it was not stolen and she respects him. It could simply mean that she decided not to be involved in efforts to overturn the election because Bill Barr, whom she respected, didn’t want to participate.

Agreed. As usual, people here are giving a knee-jerk reaction to an out of context snippet of what the media wants people to think someone said. Some people here already despise Ivanka so they are ready to believe the worst about her, but others are just not using their brains—just reacting emotionally to a manipulative sound bite spoon-fed by the media.

33 posted on 06/09/2022 10:29:24 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversaet! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson