Uh, the word 'naked' associated with some of those named in the article is not a visual I want. Anyway, most of these assclowns have any idea whatsoever of how much their daily lives depend on products derived from the use of petro related by products. Nearly everything. THEY may want to live in a mud hut with dung fires burning but not me.....
1 posted on
06/05/2022 11:05:12 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Looking around, I cannot understand why anybody who is not on the government dole would ever consider voting dimocRAT. SMH
2 posted on
06/05/2022 11:13:08 AM PDT by
bigfootbob
(Arm Up and Carry On!)
To: rktman
"They even think our pain is funny.
Your new hemp neckware looks very fasionable secretary granholm.
3 posted on
06/05/2022 11:21:41 AM PDT by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: rktman
From Neil Oliver:
“Again and again, I turn to the Keep It Simple philosophy – what some call Occam’s Razor. If it seems to make no sense that 30 million petrol and diesel cars might be replaced with electric alternatives powered by a non-existent infrastructure … that’s because the simpler explanation is that almost none of us are meant to have cars at all – electric or otherwise. If you wonder why in the US and here in Britain we are turning our backs on fracking and other sources of power under our feet and beneath our surrounding seas, it is because the intention is that we in the troublesome West should have much, much less energy available to us as ordinary people than before. The intention is not to go green. The intention is that we should go without.”
4 posted on
06/05/2022 11:23:35 AM PDT by
Qiviut
(#standup "Don't let your children die on the hill you refuse to fight on.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson