I don’t know about using USA Today as a “fact check” - even though it is true that is not a source to wave around as credible given the other things they say.
The claim that the mRNA doesn’t go away and continues to produce proteins never ending should be all someone needs to determine the credibility of this post. If the vaccines were doing this they’ve created something other than mRNA.
“The claim that the mRNA doesn’t go away and continues to produce proteins....”
mRNA molecules are by nature fragile and breakdown easily. That’s why figuring out how to protect them long enough for them to do something useful is A Big Deal.
That process incidentally is the gist of Robert Malone’s 1989 paper, which he likes to say makes him “the inventor of mRNA vaccines”. No one else in his field seems to think it makes him that, but it was an important step.