No, I have said it like it is. He is an autocrat but so is Zelenskyy too.
Since he is an autocrat and since Zelensky is an autocrat who shut down all media critical of him in Ukraine painting them all with abroad brush, stifling freedom of speech, shutting down elections, etc, then if you support Zelensky you support autocracy.
So we must support neither Zelensky or Putin and stay out of this.
And you use libtard Emotional Appeals because you lean to the left as neocons also do wanting to get involved militarily
Both are corrupt persibslly, Russia as a country is more Traditional than Ukraine is, Putin doesn’t play piano with his pecker, Zelensky is perhaps bisexual, so you can’t support either of them.
So since we can’t go around being like Bush or Obama getting involved in war after war, and we are 30 trillion in debt, they aren’t a NATO member, and your emotional appeals are what the left uses, we must stay out of this.
Don’t be a neocon!
“He is an autocrat but so is Zelenskyy too.”
BS. When Zelensky declares himself president-for-life in violation of the Ukrainian constitution, then maybe you could make that claim. Until then, it’s just another lie.
“Zelensky is an autocrat who shut down all media critical of him in Ukraine...”
In WARTIME. Countries censoring the media in wartime is a normal occurrence, and in fact, we did it right here in the good old US of A in both WW1, WW2, and the Cold War. That’s not how you detect an “autocrat”.
“And you use libtard Emotional Appeals...”
Stating that Putin is openly governing his country as a fascist dictator is a fact, not an “emotional appeal”. Stating that you are too gullible to believe his actions instead of his flowery speeches is a reasonable observation based on the facts, not an “emotional appeal”.
“Putin doesn’t play piano with his pecker, Zelensky is perhaps bisexual...”
Wait, who is using “emotional appeals” again?