Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin

That would be a useful tactic at this point. When the enemy was a strong and menacing USSR, Turkey was a geopolitical anchor of the Southern end of NATO. But that was last century. If Turkey today is not willing to fulfill its obvious role in the alliance, then cut it loose. We don’t need an unreliable obstructionist weak link in the security of the West, caught up in its own parochial rivalries and outdated issues.


14 posted on 05/17/2022 8:16:03 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard
That would be a useful tactic at this point. When the enemy was a strong and menacing USSR, Turkey was a geopolitical anchor of the Southern end of NATO. But that was last century. If Turkey today is not willing to fulfill its obvious role in the alliance, then cut it loose. We don’t need an unreliable obstructionist weak link in the security of the West, caught up in its own parochial rivalries and outdated issues.

The twin pillars of Soviet containment in the post-war era initially were Turkey and Iran. Neither are overly important to contain Russia today. Turkey wants to join the EU, but still objects to accepting European values, and is quite sensitive to criticism in a very Eastern way. Turkey will continue to be an outsider as Europe continues to integrate militarily.
30 posted on 05/18/2022 4:22:54 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson