Interesting comment at WT by “BoldTruthTell”:
“...The biggest bombshell the prosecution dropped today ... was that Joffe had been fired for cause as an FBI confidential source before Sussmann approached the FBI. If Sussmann had revealed he was there on behalf of Joffe, the FBI would not have opened the investigation because they already knew Joffe was a lying convicted felon.”
I hope the prosecution has an opportunity to question Sussman on when he learned that Joffe had been fired by the FBI. Did Sussman knowingly recruit a rogue to concoct the “evidence” he took to the FBI? Of course he did.
You said:
Interesting comment at WT by “BoldTruthTell”:
“...The biggest bombshell the prosecution dropped today ... was that Joffe had been fired for cause as an FBI confidential source before Sussmann approached the FBI. If Sussmann had revealed he was there on behalf of Joffe, the FBI would not have opened the investigation because they already knew Joffe was a lying convicted felon.”
I hope the prosecution has an opportunity to question Sussman on when he learned that Joffe had been fired by the FBI. Did Sussman knowingly recruit a rogue to concoct the “evidence” he took to the FBI? Of course he did.“
End quote
The Judge (with ties to the case) winked at Durham and told him to leave it alone.
See Next Post