The definition of bigotry looks like this:
“obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction; in particular, prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.”
So, if you say it’s ok to reject or discriminate against a group of people (or any individual of that group) based upon their religious affiliation, you’re a bigot.
Just as it’s bigotry to reject a person because they are one of “the red hats”.
Now, it might seem like “good bigotry” or whatever that Barnette is espousing, but it’s still bigotry.
Again, that won’t work in any modern USA election. Not in PA, anyways.
I wish her the best. But we need the seat to stay red.
That’s a nice leftist definition you have there.
I’m also bigoted against demons, communists, and parasites by that definition.
Too bad it’s not a proper definition.
If you have a good reason to be opposed to a group it isn’t bigotry.
Oz is in NO WAY keeping that seat red, Oz will be another Romney, I don’t know enough about the other guy HOWEVER he is a NWO guy so what the hell difference does it make just because there is an R next to their name, McConnell stood up there yesterday and actually said that Ukraine was the MOST important thing in this country NOW, 40 Billion going to Ukraine MORE important than what the hell is going wrong in THIS COUNTRY NOW!! Sorry but the candidates in PA. with an R next to their name will be exactly the same as having a Dem. Perhaps we should start focusing on flipping a seat in a different state!!