Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wikipedia removes U.S. Senate candidate's page ahead of Pennsylvania primary
Just the News ^ | May 10, 2022 | Madeleine Hubbard

Posted on 05/11/2022 12:10:28 PM PDT by gattaca

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

41 posted on 05/11/2022 3:19:28 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

She should have a page as a notable person under Wikipedia’s standards for being a national media personality and a previous nominee for Congress prior to this Senate race. Far more people have pages as ‘notable people’ for much less than that.

So their reasoning does not wash.


42 posted on 05/11/2022 4:00:57 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Wow. Infuriating!


43 posted on 05/11/2022 6:21:36 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Her page was there when I checked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_United_States_Senate_election_in_Pennsylvania#Republican_primary


44 posted on 05/11/2022 6:23:29 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
Seasoned WP editors know that they have an extensive list of Policies and guidelines (resulting in instruction creep and their interpretation of them in order to justify censoring edits. And thereby deter editing (Various figures involved with the Wikimedia Foundation have argued that Wikipedia's increasingly complex policies and guidelines are driving away new contributors to the siteand maintain liberal control.

*Wikipedia administrator Oliver Moran views "policy creep" as the major barrier, writing that "the loose collective running the site today, estimated to be 90 percent male, operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere that deters newcomers who might increase participation in Wikipedia and broaden its coverage".[212] According to Jemielniak, the sheer complexity of the rules and laws governing content and editor behavior has become excessive and creates a learning burden for new editors.[7][213]

45 posted on 05/11/2022 6:47:32 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save U + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson