“The passive-aggressive regulations at issue in this case are mirrored by remarkably similar barriers to voting that were struck down by the Supreme Court more than 50 years ago.”
An excellent legal argument.
L
It’s interesting. The right to vote is implied but not actually stated in the Constitution. Later amendments said it could not be restricted because of race or former slave hood, sex, age (if over 18) and failure to pay a poll tax. Whereas the right to keep and bear arms is plainly stated in the 2nd Amendment. Yet it is the right to keep arms that is the red-headed step child of guaranteed rights.