[semimojo]

If it's a f***ing place where the public gather to communicate with each other, then the place has no right to censor the public.

But it's not 'the public'. It's a group of people who formally agreed to the TOS.

These people said they would play by the rules if they were let in.

You've made clear that principle isn't very important to you but shouldn't that matter?

[DiogenesLamp]

But it's not 'the public'. It's a group of people who formally agreed to the TOS.

You cannot give up inherent rights through contract.

These people said they would play by the rules if they were let in.

Normal people would assume normal rules. Discriminating against the public is not nor should it be normal. If the rules required the banning of black people, should anyone respect them?

You've made clear that principle isn't very important to you but shouldn't that matter?

Principles are very important to me. You are just defending a lesser one at the expense of a far greater one.

You are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. You are "penny wise and pound foolish."

You have your priorities mixed up.