Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortes fortuna juvat

Same place the Court got the power in Roe v Wade! In the “penumbra”


No, SCOTUS claimed that it found the right to abortion hiding in the penumbra of a a right to privacy implied, but not actually stated in the 4th Amendment.

Congress is supposed to be bound by the powers granted to it and the Federal government in Article 1, Section 8. Nowhere in there is provision for Congress to declare ‘rights’ into existence. Congress could declare abortion legal in the District of Columbia and I suppose on military bases. Their usual way of creating national laws is through the ‘commerce clause’ but I cannot think of how they can use that to justify legalizing abortion nation-wide.

It’s akin to the problem with imposing national mask and or vaccination mandates.
I’m not saying they won’t try, they probably will. I’m just old-fashioned and believe that Congress should follow the text and spirit of the document that established Congress in the first place.


99 posted on 05/03/2022 3:22:57 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: hanamizu

I’m just old-fashioned and believe that Congress should follow the text and spirit of the document that established Congress in the first place.
................................................
Likewise. Which is why I maintain that arguments supporting the right to abortion in Rov v Wade were based on what has been coined the “penumbra” of the powers defined in the Constitution rather than on the literal meaning of its provisions.


107 posted on 05/03/2022 4:00:58 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (It's obvious! Democrat politicians and voters are dangerously psychotic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson