Posted on 05/02/2022 7:32:45 AM PDT by marktwain
Maybe because I worked in film for years and have some idea how the sausage is made or maybe it’s an outgrowth of my personality, but I rarely cry in the movies.
Nevertheless, midway through Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary “2000 Mules”—made in close collaboration with Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote—to my surprise, I found myself tearing up.
Corny as it may sound, I was crying… for the United States of America.
The movie documents with explicit evidence how our democratic republic is being destroyed—may already has been destroyed—through the utter sabotage of our electoral system through a mindbogglingly large network of “mules.”
These “mules” are vote harvesters paid to drop extraordinary numbers of ballots—the movie scrupulously undercounts this for the most part, but you get the idea—in boxes in all the swing states, plus one can only guess how many other states as well.
This was done for the most part between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m.—when most of us vote, no? And, yes, there are videos. Tons of them.
There is also geo-tracking.
I will have more to say about all that, while observing the reviewer’s rule of not completely ruining the story. But first allow me to say: absolutely see this movie! Equally, if not more, importantly, try to get your liberal and progressive friends and family to see it. I know this will be difficult, that they will resist at all costs or reject as disinformation what is in front of their eyes, but changing even one mind is worth the effort, possibly even heroic.
For many Epoch Times readers, the first few minutes of this film will seem familiar, although a necessary preamble. The media coverage of the 2020 election is rehearsed, all the way to the events of Jan. 6 that D’Souza calls at a later point, quite accurately and originally I think, a “primal scream,” not an “insurrection.”
This is followed by a bull session of conservative heavyweights (Larry Elder, Dennis Prager, Sebastian Gorka, Eric Metaxas, Charlie Kirk, and D’Souza). They are discussing whether that 2020 election was sufficiently corrupted to have changed the result and consequently whether former President Donald Trump should have moved on, as suggested by certain conservative pundits and politicians and by his own former attorney general. (Wouldn’t it be fascinating to watch this movie with him?)
While interesting to see where each one stood on the question, if you didn’t already know—Prager was the agnostic of the group at that point—you might be ready, as I was, to move on.
Patience, grasshopper.
Cut and you are in the studio of Catherine Engelbrecht with Gregg Phillips and the movie takes off like the proverbial rocket ship. Indeed, it becomes deeply compelling, so compelling, in fact, that I, watching on a reviewer’s download, would stop the film frequently to take notes before starting again.
Engelbrecht has been about reforming our failing electoral system since 2010, notable since that is considerably BT (Before Trump) so this didn’t all begin just to counter the countering of Trump. But she, as they say, took it up a notch when she began working with the technologically-minded Phillips.
In macro, what Engelbrecht and Phillips have done is to turn on its head what concerns many American citizens—not just conservatives but those who believe in civil liberties in general—that our government and Big Tech, separately and together, have been spying on our activities and whereabouts for years. We already live a life close to the beleaguered Chinese citizens tracked via their “social credit” system.
This is done in our case largely through our ubiquitous cellphones that, if the right apps are on board, and often we don’t know which is which, are able to track us even when the phone is turned off.
I knew that, but what I didn’t know—and learned almost with a gasp from the film (maybe I was naïve)—was that this tracking information has been gleaned by many local private companies and could be bought for a price.
True the Vote did that and used the geo-tracking to follow many “mules” in their nighttime travels from dropbox to dropbox. These peregrinations were matched with large numbers of videos of the ballot stuffing—staggering numbers, actually—that are available from several of the states, notably Georgia. Others seem to have “lost” them (Arizona).
You get to watch many of these videos in the film. I predict your mouth will be open, as was mine.
“2000 Mules” offers several mathematical formulations—depending on number of drop boxes, number of “mules,” how many ballots per “mule” and so forth—for how this stuffing of the drop boxes affected the overall election, none of them good for Team Biden.
In case you’re interested, the “mules,” according to a whistleblower, got $10 per vote, more during the Georgia Senate runoff.
More importantly, who are these drivers, who are the “mules” who are doing all this? Well, they vary, but while Engelbrecht and Phillips were exploring proofs for the accuracy of their system, including replicating a known crime via their geo-tracking, something interesting came up.
Guess whose activities and movements amazingly matched that of the “mules” in several instances via that same geo-tracking?
Ever heard of “Antifa”?
Aren’t we glad Dinesh D’Souza is making movies?
Okay, go see this film and help it “move the needle.” To do so, go to 2000Mules.com. It starts today, May 2, 2022. As of May 7, it will also be available for digital download on Rumble-owned platform Locals and Salem Media platform SalemNow. None of these are cancelable.
No doubt it’s how Obozo won a second term.
NOTHING will happen as a result of this film. Not one single indictment or Congressional action by either party. This is yet another symbol of the decline and fall of the American Empire.
I whole heartedly agree
>>Playing devil’s advocate with this.<<
The author at the Wash Post link you cited tries to make the case that: 1) the votes themselves aren’t alleged to be illegal votes, and 2) so what if people (the mules) took them to drop boxes as long as the votes were legal and drop boxes were allowed?
What he fails to explain, as I believe the movie demonstrates, is why those “mules” felt the need to have a route covering dozens of drop boxes if, in fact, the ballots they were carrying were legal ballots, and if the “mules” were violating no laws. Why not just deposit the entire stash of ballots in the first drop box he encountered, the nearest one? Why deposit a few and move on to the next drop box? An exercise regimen, perhaps?
Frankly, I would argue that such behavior is an indication that the ballots themselves were fraudulent, and not just that legal votes were being cast in an illegal manner.
>>“try to get your liberal and progressive friends and family to see it.”
That’s the problem. Libs and progs will refuse, so the movie basically is preaching to the choir.<<
Granted, so maybe get a NeverTrumper friend to see it? Or one of those soccer moms now upset at Biden’s treatment of their kids in school, but who voted for Biden because of mean tweets?
Oh, they "get" it.
The whole purpose is to make it easy to cheat.
No. Incorrect.
The votes were *not legal*
The ballots were legal. That is the whole point of sending out millions of unsecured ballots.
Then the vote harvesters are able to obtain about 7% of those unsecured ballots. Then they collect them in processing centers.
What we do not have, yet, is someone from a processing center testifying under oath, how they process them to be sure they get the votes they want.
Then the processing centers pay these mules to get them into the drop boxes.
That is all illegal. It is explained in the film.
It is also illegal to pay someone to deliver the votes to the drop boxes.
Does the film name any of the perps? With thousands involved as mules alone, and hundreds more distributing the ballots and sending payments, there’s got to be a trail.
There are some exceptions, but ballot harvesting is illegal in Georgia.
I get that and I don’t really disagree that it possibly occurred but without proof it is just an allegation and meaningless.
What is fact though is that democrats hustled big time in their stronghold areas to gather up a marked ballot from every eligible voter. You can track their success by the percentages of cast votes in particular districts. Many urban districts reporting 95%+ while too many rural more conservative districts were lucky to top 70%. That is just a really good ground game.
This link works:
Here is an idea for Marjorie Taylor Green or someone else in Congress. Write and sponsor a bill that would make intentional Voter Fraud a Federal Felony Crime punishable by a mandatory 25 year Federal prison sentence.
Let the Democrats vote against that.
No. In most states doing what is described in the movie is illegal.
The biggest problem with it is the chain of custody is broken.
The movie proves lots of violations of election law.
Get your orders in for RFID-blocking bags/purses/wallets. After you see the movie, you will realize just how tracked you are...
“I’m waiting for Tucker, Gutfield, Waters, Laura and Hannity to push the film....”
Fox: Ranting for Ratings.
There is never a solution provided on Fox, only Rantings for Ratings.
Everyone should buy at least a copy and have it shipped to local election officials, or lawmakers in your state. Just think if Senator so in so started getting these in their office mail.
I agree with the reviewer, well worth the effort to see this film....
That sounds like surefire evidence of fraud. You have a link to that website?>>> They don’t update the voter registration accurately so there is no way to prove fraud. if your incompetent your just a regular worker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.