Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Just when you thought the usps couldn’t get any worse and slower.....
2 posted on
04/28/2022 7:39:19 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Center for Biological Diversity has their fingers in every enviro lawsuit.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If I were the Judge-
Ok counselor, I expect Sworn Affidavits by every member of all of these groups, including YOU Counselor, that NONE of you Own, Possess, Or utilize ANY Vehicle of any kind thatr uses Fossil Fuels. If you do not produce them by 9 Am tomorrow, bring your Toothbrush, because I will find you in contempt of court and sanction you the MAXIMUM under current rules. You will spend the next 90 days in JAIL, General Population
4 posted on
04/28/2022 7:43:27 AM PDT by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Because the USPS opted for IC engine vehicles.
5 posted on
04/28/2022 7:43:55 AM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It has always been a real shame that a fringe interest group can bring such leverage to bear on the rest of us. Here is just a continuing example of that travesty.
9 posted on
04/28/2022 7:46:13 AM PDT by
Oscar in Batangas
(An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Postal delivery is one of the better uses for electric vehicles. The routes are predictable, and the amount of stop and start driving and the amount of idle time means that going electric actually saves energy.
I’m not a big fan of electric vehicles in general, but for certain specialty applications, they make sense, and this is one of them.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
GOOD..such vehicles that DO NOT require SPEED or carry HEAVY LOADS can operate this way. Same for taxis..use hydro fuel cells.
There are ways to limit that amount of fuel used by such vehicles so that it can be used for vehicles that need the THERMO COMBUSTION ENGINE
11 posted on
04/28/2022 7:46:53 AM PDT by
Paul46360
(What??ME worry?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It’s situational but electric may not be a bad option for some delivery routes. Our guy stops at each mailbox along the curb shutting the engine off each time. I always imagined they go through starters and batteries like crazy. Of course I don’t really know what’s involved with EV maintenance..
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How the hell do these a-holes have standing?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No Standing.....................
15 posted on
04/28/2022 7:50:10 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Plaintiffs contend that purchases of fossil fuel-powered delivery vehicles will cause environmental harm for decades to come. “Louis DeJoy’s gas-guzzling fleet guarantees decades of pollution with every postcard and package,” Exactly where do these twits think the power comes from to charge their batteries?
If these clowns think solar and wind can take over, just ask the people in North TX who suffered from last year's brownout what they think about it. Imagine what it would be like if those people had plugged in to charge almost a million cars.
16 posted on
04/28/2022 7:50:24 AM PDT by
econjack
(I'm not bossy. I just know what you should be doing.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
There is no such a thing as a fossil fuel
17 posted on
04/28/2022 7:51:47 AM PDT by
joe fonebone
(And the people said NO! The End)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’d like to sue regarding a long, long list of gubbmint actions that I don’t agree with. Who do I contact?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
...purchases of fossil fuel-powered delivery vehicles will cause environmental harm for decades to come.
Have they done an environmental study on electric delivery vehicles environmental harm? Retards!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
24 posted on
04/28/2022 7:59:38 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
In some areas, the USPS requires a carrier to drive their own vehicles. Have to be large enough to hold packages etc.,
Any increases in operation costs are always followed by increased stamp/postage rates.
30 posted on
04/28/2022 8:15:48 AM PDT by
sodpoodle
(Life is prickly, carry tweezers.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Mail delivery should be provided by private contractors who bid to provide services.
Snail mail is a dying service.
Package delivery is the survivor.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I do not doubt that every one of these oxygen sucking TWOT’s are pushing this ‘cause the CCP wants more money for its batteries. That is all this push is about, laundering more $$ for the CCP.
33 posted on
04/28/2022 8:25:51 AM PDT by
bobbo666
(Baizuo)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So they will run on coal and not petroleum. And will be more expensive, but I guess that’s coming anyway.
37 posted on
04/28/2022 8:36:39 AM PDT by
Salman
(It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
fossil fuel-powered delivery vehicles will cause environmental harm for decades to come. I wish, for once, that the judge says:
PROVE IT
40 posted on
04/28/2022 9:43:51 AM PDT by
red-dawg
(How does confiscating money from us and giving it to chicken-little bureaucrats stop climate change?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson