Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Gov. DeSantis to seek end to Disney’s taxing district in special session
washingtontimes.com ^ | 4/19/2022 | susan ferrechio

Posted on 04/19/2022 8:54:18 AM PDT by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: semimojo

Disney is perfectly free to exercise free speech.


61 posted on 04/19/2022 4:15:33 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Disney is perfectly free to exercise free speech.

And our Constitution forbids the state from retaliating for it by passing laws targeted at one company in response to that speech.

You know that.

62 posted on 04/19/2022 4:31:26 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

There is no a priori restriction on Disney’s free speech.

You know that.


63 posted on 04/19/2022 4:38:25 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Disney needs to hold firm and threaten to move to Chicago.


64 posted on 04/19/2022 4:54:40 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

65 posted on 04/19/2022 5:32:48 PM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kara37
Well, no one else in the whole country gets to keep the same tax laws for decades.

I guess not.

The first federal income tax was created in 1861 during the Civil War as a mechanism to finance the war effort. Following the end of the Civil War, the income tax did not have substantial support and was repealed in 1872.

In 1894, Congress passed the Wilson-Gorman tariff which established a tax rate of 2% for annual income over $4,000, but it was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1895. In the early 20th century, the income tax enjoyed renewed support and, in February of 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution was ratified, granting Congress the power to tax personal income.

The original income tax was 1% for the bottom bracket, which was comprised of income up to $20,000, and 7% for the top bracket, which was comprised of income over $500,000.
66 posted on 04/19/2022 7:30:49 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

“I don’t like the state going after a company because they dislike its politics, and I think people should think through the implications of supporting that kind of activity.”

How about if their “politics” is the Iranian government perspective of death to America?

How about if their “politics” says we should hunt down and kill all Christians?

How about if their “politics” says it’s okay to kill babies you don’t want during the first few weeks (or years) after birth?

How about if their “politics” says all children should be taken from their biological parents and given to pedophiles to teach them sex?

We are dealing with people who are depraved and insane. These are not merely “political” differences. These are existential threats.

In this specific case, Disney has privileges no other entity has. They have a market cap of a quarter of a trillion dollars (more than a hundred BILLION bigger than Netflix). They are the world’s largest media company (depending on your definition, as Meta, Apple, Microsoft, and Google are bigger) and are NOT headquartered in Florida. They are a California-based multi-national corp. But they have basically been able to operate autonomously for decades. It’s a reasonable relationship as long as they are not becoming a political activist in the state. Disney is neither representing the interests of the residents of Florida, their shareholders, or the children and parents affected by the Florida Parental Rights in Education bill.

Basically some of their loudmouth employees demanded to use the money, power, and clout of Disney to promote their personal political beliefs without ever consulting the actual owners of the company (the shareholders). Neither the Board nor the employees have the legal right to steal the owners’ interests in this way. It is no different than embezzlement. it is a kind of theft. Further, the board members have a fiduciary obligation to the shareholders by law. Here they are acting in their OWN interests, which is illegal.

And Disney, as arguably the most powerful media company in the world, participated in spreading blatant lies about the legislation. Honestly, this slap on the wrist is far to small. People should be going to prison. Unfortunately, we live in a day where justice is rare.


67 posted on 04/19/2022 9:51:40 PM PDT by unlearner (Si vis pacem, para bellum. Let him who desires peace prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson