[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . but may nonetheless have been working to prevent Congress from certifying President Biden’s election win."

And there are perfectly legal ways of doing that, by delaying certification of one or more states by presenting evidence that their vote tally is tainted or inaccurate. The fact that the Senate even votes on this indicates that the certification is not a done deal, but is subject to challenge.

[hanamizu]

“And there are perfectly legal ways of doing that, by delaying certification of one or more states by presenting evidence that their vote tally is tainted or inaccurate...”

---

I have a pretty good memory of that day. There were going to be six or seven challenges to states’ electors. The so-called ‘riot’ began just as Arizona’s electors were being challenged. The procedure was postponed for several hours until the Capitol was cleared. The challenge to Arizona was quickly disposed of and I don’t believe that any other challenges were entertained.

Somehow it all worked out perfectly for the dems. Not only were Biden-Harris confirmed as elected, President Trump was impeached yet again, people who entered the Congress were jailed without bail, and Senators/Representatives who favored the challenges were branded as ‘insurrectionists’.

[one guy in new jersey]

Imagine the shame value in a VPOTUS, on January 6th, turning the eye of Sauron on the single worst electoral excrement hole of a state, and asking the senators from that state, why shouldn’t I pull the trigger on an investigation here? What kind of crap are the people of your state trying to pull? What do I look like? The [expletive deleted] night watchman? I am this close to refusing to certify your state’s electoral tally. How does that make you feel? Should I care how that makes you feel? Remind me again why I agreed to take this job? This bucket of warm [substance]? Did I do it to be used like a dishrag by some Soros-paid hack Secretary of State? I will certify when I am darn good and ready. Have I made myself clear?