To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why bother with a detailed answer when she knew Cruz was a no vote to begin with?
To: DoodleDawg
Part a. was the illuminating part.
The explanation in part b. would have been post-modern obscurantism, thus meaningless in the face of the candidate who is openly hostile to the negative rights found in the Constitution that guards against the government from encroaching on the natural rights (Mainly the Bill of Rights).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson