Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

Russia doesn’t have the army to engage in a multi-front war. The question I would ask is who would come to Russia’s defense? The Chicoms might think it would be a great time to tackle Taiwan, but I seriously doubt if their battle equipment is much better that what Russia is using.

I heard some expert from one of the Washington think tanks on the radio the other day and he was explaining how Russia and China have poured money into sexy new weapons systems, but they ignore the support systems, troop training, and logistics and supply, as well as their primary infantry forces.

He said they look 10 feet tall and bullet proof but doubts that they are prepared for sustained battle operations. So, their fall back is nuclear weapons.


41 posted on 03/11/2022 1:17:18 PM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shotgun

“their fall back is nuclear weapons”

I agree with your comments. That is why the situation is very dangerous (on the one hand) and can be fixed with intelligent and calm negotiations (on the other hand).

Under a normal administration there would be no name calling and finger pointing, just calm behind the scenes work to create a win win scenario.


57 posted on 03/11/2022 1:28:05 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: shotgun

“The question I would ask is who would come to Russia’s defense? “

1,500 nuclear warheads mounted, and ready to deliver on a moments notice.

Another 5,000 in reserve.


96 posted on 03/11/2022 2:00:11 PM PST by Mariner (War criminal #18 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson