Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Justice Alito's gerrymandering flip-flop should worry Democrats
msn.com ^ | 3/10/22 | Jessica Levinson

Posted on 03/10/2022 6:32:42 AM PST by cotton1706

State lawmakers may soon have virtually unfettered power to draw congressional district lines. If this happens, it could undermine the democratic process and upend a century’s worth of case law.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Because courts deciding congressional and legislative districts are SOOO part of the "democratic process."

Amazing how these people think. And how ignorant of history they are.

LEGISLATURES, that is, the people's representatives, have historically been the preeminent bodies in America.

But to those that have been made to believe that policy is properly made by courts, this is a foreign concept.

1 posted on 03/10/2022 6:32:42 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

When the Dems control a legislature the Jerrymander is a good thing.

When the Repubs control a legislature the Jerrymander is an absolute threat to our Democracy is the logic of liberals.


2 posted on 03/10/2022 6:38:11 AM PST by cpdiii (CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

If msn.com is whining about it, it must be a good thing.


3 posted on 03/10/2022 6:39:12 AM PST by JJBookman (Do the opposite day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Thing like the Voting Rights Act opened the door for judges to rule on these cases, but shouldn’t have. Yes, blacks should be able to vote without obstacles, but NO, districts should not have to be drawn with the sole purpose of assuring the election of blacks, or any other skin color.


4 posted on 03/10/2022 6:39:43 AM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart, I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Translation: Dems won’t get everything they want.

Nothing is ever settled until it is settled the way the Left wants it settled, and then it is settled. The only way to avoid this is to get rid of the Left.


5 posted on 03/10/2022 6:40:18 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Nailed it.


6 posted on 03/10/2022 6:48:46 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Alito WAS on the anti-Constitutional side? WTH?


7 posted on 03/10/2022 6:50:00 AM PST by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Tell that to those of us in PA who had the State Supreme Court have the last say and agreed with Dems in the changed redistricting map.


8 posted on 03/10/2022 6:50:55 AM PST by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Heads, the Communists win. Tails, the Constitutionalists lose. Great system.


9 posted on 03/10/2022 6:51:52 AM PST by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He suddenly realized that Communists don’t have a supreme court. No need.


10 posted on 03/10/2022 7:11:29 AM PST by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The right of state legislatures to redefine congressional districts is sacrosanct as defined by the Constitution. The founders intended for whatever prejudices exist in state legislatures to dictate congressional boundaries. Courts have no authority over redistricting.


11 posted on 03/10/2022 7:38:06 AM PST by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

We can eliminate gerrymandering by ....well...... gerrymandering.


12 posted on 03/10/2022 7:43:57 AM PST by PhillyPhreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

That has to posilutey and absitively without any chance of comeback, ever.


13 posted on 03/10/2022 8:15:47 AM PST by .44 Special (Taimid Buacharch )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“..State lawmakers may soon have virtually unfettered power to draw congressional district lines...”

States control state and national elections according to the Constitution - it is there in black and white - loud and clear!!!


14 posted on 03/10/2022 8:19:18 AM PST by elpadre (And here in NCini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All
"State lawmakers may soon have virtually unfettered power to draw congressional district lines."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

The very corrupt, alleged election-stealing, Democratic-pirated Congress aside, if I understand the concerns correctly, state lawmakers cannot have unfettered power to draw congressional district lines. This is for the simple reason that post-Civil War federal lawmakers not only drafted Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A) as a penalty to discourage renegade states from weakening the voting power of voter-qualified citizens in any way, but also gave Congress the express power to enforce section 2.

Note that after giving federal elections laws a quick review, sadly, controversies concerning election-related constitutional clauses, like Section 2 of 14A, is where at least part of the cold war aspect of the Civil War is still being fought imo.

Regarding the ongoing, post-Civil War "cold war" evidently still being fought by the very corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties imo, please consider the following. The excerpt from "Single-member district" below seems to be an example of the bonafide use of Congress's 14A power to make laws that discourage renegade states from "abridging in any way" the voting power of ordinary qualified citizen voters.

Astonishingly, as if past generations of Democrats never got the message about the vote-rigging penalty Section 2 of 14A, Republican federal lawmakers made the indicated law in 1967. Republicans recognized the potential for rigging (my word) voting district maps as a backdoor for weakening voting power, and used their 14A power to mandate single-member House districts to help prevent Democrats from diluting the electoral power of African Americans with strategically drawn, multi-member districts.

"On Dec 14, 1967, single-member House districts were mandated by law (2 U.S. Code §2c), under the justification that they served as bulwarks against southern Democrats diluting the electoral power of African Americans by using strategically drawn at-large multi-member districts (they could, for instance, create a single statewide multi-member district elected by plurality vote, all but guaranteeing the white majority would elect all Democrats)." —Single-member district

Corrections, insights welcome.

The following example links are for when anybody has some time.


15 posted on 03/10/2022 1:57:03 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson