https://twitter.com/sumlenny/status/1655855625899765760
Strelkov:
Was a parade on Red Square necessary today? My answer: yes, it was needed - to show that we are not afraid and are true to tradition. But the composition of the parade (only a few types of heavy equipment) raises questions. It is clear that the Tamanskaya and Kantemirovskaya divisions (which traditionally paraded combat armored vehicles) are almost entirely at the front. But, what does it mean for only a company of wheeled armored personnel carriers based on KAMAZ to pass through the area (by the way, in all the main parameters, these armored personnel carriers are WORSE than the standard BTR-80 and BTR-90 - both in terms of cross-country ability, and in terms of maneuverability, and in terms of armament.
As for armor protection - I don't know. Is it easier to manufacture and cheaper)? Well, another column of S-300s and Yars of the Strategic Missile Forces. But other? Out of stock at all? Is everyone at the front?
Maybe, in this case, it was worth limiting ourselves only to parade crews on foot?
For that, the foot Cossacks pleased. With daggers ... it's a pity - the archers have not been revived yet. Their passage with reeds at the ready would have caused a sensation ... and still missing was Prigozhin with a sledgehammer and in a red executioner's cap. But I'm already snarky, of course ...