Posted on 02/18/2022 3:31:07 PM PST by Coronal
I have no problem identifying all the proven frauds through, and even before, the entire course of the WHO-declared pandemic.
Given breakthrough cases of Covid for the "vaccinated" and "boosted" as one reads from media the world around, which medications/drugs/treatments/protocols do you prefer, as we are discussing Covid meds?
Your reply would be greatly appreciated.
It would be if it were being peddled by big pharma. Once the FDA, CDC and little turds like Fauci get their cut Ivermectin would be the go to drug of choice.
Please don’t review any studies around the world CDC they might make sense.
Who is doing the autopsies here to find out the causes of so many deaths. Not many. Too afraid of finding the truth.
I suspect you are "over the target." Meanwhile little tidbits like "Pfizer's" business "warning" and most of Scandinavia's shrugging off mandates and restrictions suggest the "event" is well past its prime.
Check out the death rates for the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated. That should convince any sane person that the vaccines were very effective in helping people fight the virus.
look for this chart “Age-Adjusted Rates of COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations by Vaccination Status in Adults Ages ≥18 Years, October 2021–January 2022” about 3/4 of the way down this page: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#covidnet-hospitalizations-vaccination
Similar charts are available for every county on earth and every municipality in the US. If the virus reached you and you were vaxxed and boosted, you were extremely likely to fight it off. If not, the chances of hospitalization and death were much much higher. The lies about this are a tragedy, and the deaths are disproportionately impacting conservatives who are believing the lies.
In implied pejorative in the remark coupled to your use of the "official" CDC data reporting suggests that your are a supporter of the CDC's official positions, and proving their views by referring back to them.
'This is what they say, and so what they say proves what they say.'
As of 21 February 2022,
( 935,336 US deaths over twenty-six months / 331,449,281 population of US ) x 100 = 0.282 % mortality rate.
Source: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
The CDC site shows 930,811, something less than Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center. All "official" sites report rather similar numbers for the US.
Thus, across the two plus years of the pandemic event, JHU and CDC data say that about 99.72 % of Americans have not succumbed to this deadly virus. Even in the year before there were "emergency use" products with legal shielding.
( 5,888,779 global deaths / 7,928,690,901 global population ) x 100 = 0.074 % mortality rate.
But comparing the US-CDC sefl-congratulations via "safe and effective," one compares the mortality rate of the US -- 0.282 % -- with the global mortality rate -- 0.074 % -- to learn that the US' CDC-led fight against Covid-19 is among the worst in the world. Almost four times WORSE than the world average, and much of that world without the fine leadership of the CDC.
For this reason, mortality rate compared to mortality rate, your proof that the CDC is correct by your citing the CDC does not convince, except to testify that you accept the CDC's data and conclusions.
Among the official CDC's data is the tale. Covid-19 have been and remains survivable by 99.72 % of Americans.
You end your comment with "The lies about this are a tragedy, and the deaths are disproportionately impacting conservatives who are believing the lies."
That is an assertion for which there is NO data. It is an assertion worthy of Anthony Fauci.
>>“Malaysian researchers”<<
>>Stopped reading<<
Right? Who gives a rat’s patootie about so called third world researchers?
The word “zinc” does not appear anywhere in this article, either.
The treatment protocol with ivermectin includes zinc. If they are “studying” this without the zinc, what is the point?
But then again as regards his and your source, the CDC -- "The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and, until recently, wastewater analyses. For more than a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations for Covid-19 in the United States and broken it down by age, race and vaccination status. But it has not made most of the information public. When the C.D.C. published the first significant data on the effectiveness of boosters in adults younger than 65 two weeks ago, it left out the numbers for a huge portion of that population: 18- to 49-year-olds, the group the data showed was least..."
New York Times per the New York Times. Via: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4040198/posts
Pejoratives before. Pejorative now -- "anti-vaxxer." I've been vaccinated plenty of times from childhood through the US Army through until some years back, but NOT with an mRNA experimental.
Name-calling is what you've got. Your citing someone citing his someone else doesn't refute the mortality rate based on "official" sources.
As of 21 February 2022,
( 935,336 US deaths over twenty-six months / 331,449,281 population of US ) x 100 = 0.282 % mortality rate.
Source: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
The CDC site shows 930,811, something less than Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center. All "official" sites report rather similar numbers for the US.
Thus, across the two plus years of the pandemic event, JHU and CDC data say that about 99.72 % of Americans have not succumbed to this deadly virus. ( 5,888,779 global deaths / 7,928,690,901 global population ) x 100 = 0.074 % mortality rate.
Among the official CDC's data is the tale. Covid-19 have been and remains survivable by 99.72 % of Americans.
It’s perfectly natural to argue with the fact provider when you don’t like a fact, so don’t beat yourself up over it.
Unless someone you care about gets really sick and they failed to protect themself with a vaccine because of misinformation you helped spread. Definitely do beat yourself up about it if that happens.
An exchange littered with sophistry, name-calling and "ifs" on your part is neither debate nor real discussion.
( 935,336 US deaths over twenty-six months / 331,449,281 population of US ) x 100 = 0.282 % mortality rate.
Source: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
The CDC site shows 930,811, something less than Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center. All "official" sites report rather similar numbers for the US.
Thus, across the two plus years of the pandemic event, JHU and CDC data say that about 99.72 % of Americans have not succumbed to this deadly virus.
( 5,888,779 global deaths / 7,928,690,901 global population ) x 100 = 0.074 % mortality rate.
Among the official CDC's data is the tale. Covid-19 has been and remains survivable by 99.72 % of Americans.
Scary graphs and name-calling don't affect that. Nor does "if."
This Maylasia study used Ivermectin plus an undefined standard of care, or standard care alone. The Uttar Pradesh effort used multiply items including Ivermectin with a lot of other important inputs. Medically, the Uttar Pradesh effort was far more patient oriented and effective. See this link giving complete details on what all was used and done in UP:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.