Posted on 02/09/2022 6:03:22 AM PST by Widget Jr
bramps wrote: “You have to be looking at the wrong link.”
And, you can’t seem to back up your claims.
I’ll say this for you. You are a WEALTH of government-supplied Covid Koolaid BS. No point in talking to you, frankly. And, the vaccines were put under immunity under PREP in February of 2020 by the Director of HHS. That! is a a fact no matter what specious law they’re under now.
Gaffer wrote: “And, the vaccines were put under immunity under PREP in February of 2020 by the Director of HHS. That! is a a fact no matter what specious law they’re under now.”
All vaccines are under some form of immunity.
“David Bowman, a spokesperson for the Health Resources and Services Administration — the federal agency that oversees compensation programs for those who allege injuries following vaccination — told us in an email that there “are no liability or compensation differences between a countermeasure approved under an EUA or one that has received full FDA approval.””
Just great. Factcheck.org. Nothing like a leftist mouthpiece to bolster your argument.
No matter what state agency or leftist platform you dig up to say that FDA approval process wasn’t rushed doesn’t make it so. If you read your cite, you’d have seen they explained a lot of it away with handwaving, overlapping phases, and EARLY relevant vaccine development (gee, how’d they manage that for a Chinese street market bat contamination?)
Just go peddle your stuff somewhere else, fella...
Gaffer wrote: “No matter what state agency or leftist platform you dig up to say that FDA approval process wasn’t rushed doesn’t make it so.”
No matter what anti-vaxxer website you dig up to say that FDA approval process was rushed doesn’t make it so.
He doesn't get out much. Maybe he is too busy washing dishes or hanging drywall? Or maybe he likes his gig and doesn't have the stones to really tell the truth when it can make a difference?
“The mechanism whereby hydroxychloroquine with zinc works is well known and easily demonstrate in vitro”
The 2005 lab test was against SARS-1 using chloroquine on African Green Monkey tissue. HCQ is a less toxic version of chloroquine. It was very effective.
There was no opportunity to try it “in vivo” on people because the original SARS outbreak had ended by summer 2003.
The first chance to see if HCQ or chloroquine would be effective on SARS outside of a lab setting came with Covid-19, SARS-2. It was tried, reports can be found at PubMed. One example I recall was nurses in Vietnam who worked with Covid patients. They were given HCQ as a prophylactic in the hope that they wouldn’t get infected. But they caught Covid at the same rate as when they weren’t taking HCQ. What works in a lab doesn’t always work in people.
At 67, that's all I'm doing. Been taking this combo for many months. Not vaxx'd and feeling great!
Cindy Sheehan comes to ind.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.