Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUBIO WARNS: If Mike Pence could decide last election, what’s to stop Kamala Harris deciding next?
The Washington Times ^ | Feb 6 | By Seth McLaughlin

Posted on 02/06/2022 1:45:46 PM PST by RandFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: Alberta's Child

And there you go responding to me when I asked you nicely not to.

Just goes to show what an a$$ you are.

There was tons of evidence in Georgia. It was discovered early that theSecretary of State changed election laws and signed a Consent Decreed without authority or approval for the state legislature.

Pulitzer hacked an “un-hackable”’voting machine while testifying before the ata Ga state legislature. Ruby Freeman and her daughter are on film running the same balllots through the machines multiple times.

There was plenty of evidence. People like you and the Democrats you support didn’t want it seen.

You’re a moron. There are 3 people on this site that I routinely see being trolls. You are one of them.


121 posted on 02/06/2022 7:32:45 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
The PA legislature had all the authority they needed to vote on their own slate of electors and send it to Congress. They went to the courts because they were too cowardly to do what was right themselves.
122 posted on 02/06/2022 7:33:43 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

One more thing…..my initial comment was directed to the person that posted the article, definitely not you.

Peace.


123 posted on 02/06/2022 7:34:30 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The Governor submitted them for Nixon, which was changed at a later date. December 14th wasn’t the final date. The state has the final say.


124 posted on 02/06/2022 7:39:29 PM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Rats/Pelosi knew what was coming down, what was to b shown as evidence. They knew their flimsy steal was going to flop in their faces.

That is why they initiated the J6 tempest, to disrupt the actual objections and prevent the evidence of the coup from being exposed.

125 posted on 02/06/2022 7:44:08 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
THERE WERE OBJECTORS IN BOTH CHAMBERS OF CONGRESS SCHEDULED TO SPEAK AND PRESENT EVIDENCE ON JANUARY 6, 2021. PENCE BLEW THEM OFF.

This is 100% false. Go back and review the proceedings of January 6th.

1. Individual members of Congress submitted objections to the electoral votes of six states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

2. Under the ECA you cited, an objection to a state’s electoral votes is only considered if the objectors include at least one member of each house of Congress. Only the Arizona and Pennsylvania objections met this standard.

3. Both houses of Congress voted BY OVERWHELMING MARGINS to override the objections to those two states.

4. January 6th is not established as a firm date in the Constitution, but the 12th Amendment clearly states that the VP must provide over a joint session of Congress to count the electoral votes. In the absence of a fixed date set in the Constitution, Congress establishes the date of that joint session (1/6/21) — just like it established the date of Election Day (11/3/16) and the date of the electoral vote certification (12/14/16).

5. The VP is the presiding officer for the joint session of Congress, not a dictator. He cannot unilaterally delay or adjourn that session without a vote of the full Congress.

126 posted on 02/06/2022 7:47:55 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TakebackGOP

The key date in 1960 was December 19th, not December 16th. It really didn’t matter if the governor certified Nixon or Kennedy as the winner before that date. What DID matter was which slate of electors was certified on December 19th … and since two different slates were certified, Hawaii was officially telling Congress that it didn’t know which candidate won the state.


127 posted on 02/06/2022 7:55:45 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“The key date in 1960 was December 19th, not December 16th. It really didn’t matter if the governor certified Nixon or Kennedy as the winner before that date. What DID matter was which slate of electors was certified on December 19th … and since two different slates were certified, Hawaii was officially telling Congress that it didn’t know which candidate won the state.”

But it was changed at a later date. You said before that it had to be submitted on one day. With all of the fraud, they were asking for 10 days to evaluate the fraud in the five states, which would have changed the result. Pence said no to that before it started.


128 posted on 02/06/2022 8:03:10 PM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Once December 14th came and went and every state certified ONE slate of electors, there wasn't a damn thing Pence (or anyone else) could do that would have met any objective constitutional scrutiny.

Just briefly reading this thread over since I last commented earlier today, and while I agree with much of what you wrote, I think this particular comment may be a little off, especially when compared to your latest post #126. In that post you infer there are some things that could have happened around January 6, such as both Houses of Congress voting to object then ultimately reject some of the electors.

Regarding what Pence could have done, he could have simply just not shown up to count ANY votes. Don’t take that as me necessarily being an advocate of that, but it would have at least delayed the votes being officially counted, and called into question any alternative counter the Congress tried to utilize.

If Pence had done anything other than what he did, it would have certainly been seen by many if not most as a Constitutional crises. I think that’s where Pence believes he drew the line, rightly or wrongly, in what this meant for the country that day, or going forward.

Trump and his most ardent supporters believe that a stolen Presidential election is a Constitutional crises in itself, so if some other crisises erupt, so be it.

Had Pence not shown up, it might have resulted in the delay Trump wanted, but I don’t think it would have necessarily helped turn the tide. There were too many forces aligned against him, even more now. It would have definitely been playing with fire thouugh, to the point Trump and Pence could have in a worst case scenario been arrested.

Bottom line I think the guilt for the stolen election starts with the perpetrators, then goes next to the local state governments, then to the courts, then finally down to Pence and even Trump themselves. Yes I said both of them, for not stopping it in advance, for not being prepeared when it happened, and not being on the same page at the end. They’ve done a pretty equally crappy job of not focusing on making sure it doesn’t happen again, since then, as far as I’m concerned. This year later argument is completely ridiculous, and should have been boiled up and excised a year ago, so that it could be off the front pages before the midterms. Thanks.

129 posted on 02/06/2022 8:20:50 PM PST by Golden Eagle (What's in YOUR injection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Yes, it was staged, a false flag to ensure the coup was not overturned.


130 posted on 02/06/2022 9:23:49 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Well, Mr Rubio, before you make judgments about future elections, answer one question.

ARE ALL ELECTIONS GOING TO PROCEED AS THE 2020 ELECTION WAS???

Will future elections have the BLATANT CHEATING THAT TOOK PLACE IN THAT ELECTION.

Try to have some perspective instead of shooting off your inane ideas.

THAT ELECTION HAD MORE WAYS OF CHEATING THAN EVER CONCEIVED IN HISTORY.


131 posted on 02/06/2022 9:45:55 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Wrong again.

Per law and rules of Congress, need only one member from each chamber to object.

This was posted extensively more than two years ago with reference links.

Now because you're so dug into your own BS, you will predictably put up more lame distraction. So, the following is not for you but for those reading and learning facts of law:

Here's the pertinent excerpt and link to law:

3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15

This is the final word on the subject in this thread in response to Alberta whatever who has discredited his/herself by falsely claiming Judas Pence acted according to the Constitution and the law.

132 posted on 02/06/2022 9:51:33 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Color Rubio gone


133 posted on 02/07/2022 9:01:15 AM PST by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson