Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
The facts SCOTUS relied on were ...

The Secretary issued the rule after finding that vaccination of healthcare workers against COVID-19 was "necessary for the health and safety of individuals to whom care and services are furnished." Id., at 61561. In many facilities, 35% or more of staff remain unvaccinated, id., at 61559, and those staff, the Secretary explained, pose a serious threat to the health and safety of patients. That determination was based on data showing that the COVID-19 virus can spread rapidly among healthcare workers and from them to patients, and that such spread is more likely when healthcare workers are unvaccinated. Id., at 61558-61561, 61567-61568, 61585-61586.

188 posted on 01/13/2022 12:44:50 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Except that the vaccine neither prevents contracting nor transmitting the virus. So, it matters not whether one is vaccinated, since both are consistently testing positive for SARS-COV-2 infection.


240 posted on 01/13/2022 1:30:18 PM PST by JME_FAN (MOLON LABE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson