Well that seals it then. If Epps "told" them then it must be true.
Most likely it comes down to a Clintonian parsing of "informant." Epps probably worked with the FBI but not strictly for the FBI. That flimsy reed is enough for the Democrats to pretend--with help from their lapdog media of course--that there's no there there.
It’s even possible that Epps didn’t know who he was working for or being influenced by. FBI moles could have been egging him on without his knowledge of who they were. And the Times is lying when it says the suspicions about Epps (and others, I might add) are “unfounded.” They are founded on the FACT that Epps, Stewart Rhodes, and several other high-profile actors on that day have NOT been charged with anything despite video and other evidence showing them taking leadership roles.
Epps never wirked for the FBI, was never an informer for the FBI, or has never worked in kaw enforcement; this is all possibly true.
Especially if Mr.Epps is an intelligence wonk that makes everything plausibly deniable.
Everyone should take nore hoe the estimable J6 committee defty moves from prosecuting the innocent to proving the demonstrably culpable innocent? I’m simply dazzled and amazed at thier deft maneuvering.
Meanwhile, not one member of eithe house will stand up and call out this miscreant bunch of charlatans what they are are; traitors to the American people. Enjoy your run. Yours names are on record.