[Blennos]

You’re obviously a leftertarian purist. There is nothing constitutional about that.

I didn't know that. Interesting.

So, I’ll predict that you’re all for open pornography of the most extreme kind in public view. You’re for gay “marriage.” You’re for no speed limits on public roads. You’re for drunk driving. Any “restriction” in your book is inherently evil.

You predict wrongly. People should not be allowed to perform acts which hurt other people. Blatant porn in public, speed limits, drunk driving. These actions can hurt others. Not allowed in my freedom utopia. Gay marriage, which I personally find disgusting, I will have to think about.

[fwdude]

“Gay marriage, which I personally find disgusting, I will have to think about.”

Of course you will. Can’t be violating your own orthodoxy.

[nagant]

Gay marriage, which I personally find disgusting, I will have to think about.
~~~~

Call it what you will. Yes, it’s disgusting ....but it’s NOT marriage. Marriage is between one man and one woman.

“Gay marriage” has two purposes:

1. To create a positive perception of people with a disgusting, addictive mental illness.

2. To force a legal framework on employers which forces them to pay for treating the illnesses which male homosexuals pass around their ranks.