Actually it is now 20:1
(Actually it is now 20:1)
One question, what did the Texas DSHS define as vaccinated? If they used two weeks after the second dose (mRNA) or two weeks after the single dose (J&J), then the study is inherently flawed because adverse reactions to the vaccine are not included. Why did they begin in Jan. 2021? A better metric is comparing the vaccinated four months later like in the Israeli study. I’ve read dozens of .gov Covid related studies and they all suffer from motivated reasoning and statistical chicanery, especially in the U.S.
Israeli study:
The new analysis relies on the database of Maccabi Healthcare Services, which enrolls about 2.5 million Israelis. The study, led by Tal Patalon and Sivan Gazit at KSM, the system’s research and innovation arm, found in two analyses that never-infected people who were vaccinated in January and February were, in June, July, and the first half of August, six to 13 times more likely to get infected than unvaccinated people who were previously infected with the coronavirus. In one analysis, comparing more than 32,000 people in the health system, the risk of developing symptomatic Covid-19 was 27 times higher among the vaccinated, and the risk of hospitalization eight times higher.
If the vaccines work, why aren’t they working? I mean, why do the vaccinated need a booster? The H1N1 vaccines killed 32 people in the U.S. before it was suspended. The Covid-19 vaccines have killed at least 20,000 (most likely ~400,000+) but are still in use. Please explain these discrepancies.