Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chief lee runamok

There are two types of anti-vaxers, those who oppose “mandates” and those who oppose science.

I am in the former group of conservatives along with Trump. I believe in the science, but am adamantly against mandates to force people to take it or force business closings etc.


8 posted on 12/23/2021 8:20:09 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasFreeper2009

“I believe in the science, but am adamantly against mandates to force people to take it or force business closings etc.”

Same here, thankful Trump provided the option of getting the vaccine or not, he never mandated them.


35 posted on 12/23/2021 8:27:19 AM PST by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009
There are two types of anti-vaxers, those who oppose “mandates” and those who oppose science.

You couldn't be more incorrect in part 2 of that statement if you are particularly referring to the current experimental gene therapy agent as a "vaccine".

Mandates are laws written by bureaucrats and non-legislatures.

As far as "science" is concerned, Taking a jab of a drug with NO long term studies for an illness that, while often serious, has been grossly and fraudulently represented by those with an interest in controlling and fleecing the population. Even the nearer term testing has been found to be flawed and misrepresented.

Does respect for science dictate that one take such a drug that has clearly been shown to have a low and short term efficacy? Unless I am terminal or suffering from a serious untreatable illness, I am not taking any drug that hasn't been on the market for at least 10 years and has quality, long term testing backing it up. That, my FRiend, is science.

83 posted on 12/23/2021 8:42:38 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“Oppose science”? Really? Have you that much avoided looking deeper into the evidence?


154 posted on 12/23/2021 9:09:09 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I oppose the mandates.

I also think these ‘vaccines’ aren’t even vaccines. They are experimental messengerRNA gene therapy sequences. I’m not against vaccines, I’m not an anti-vaxxer. I am against messengerRNA gene therapy sequences being used as ‘vaccines’ because they are not vaccines — at best they are treatments for the disease. They don’t prevent infection nor its spread.


157 posted on 12/23/2021 9:09:39 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The “science” says the mRNA vaxxines are deadly!

The “science” says they cause irreparable damage to major organs such as the heart.

The “science” says that COVID vaxxines are unnecessary. 99.?% survive COVID doing NOTHING.

The “science” says

“Calculations suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41. That means that in the U.S. alone, the actual death toll may be closer to 374,576. Including international deaths reported to VAERS would put the death toll at 815,326

https://www.nutritruth.org/single-post/predicted-vax-statistics-come-true-grim-beyond-belief


354 posted on 12/23/2021 1:34:44 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson