Also: If the Supreme Court decision over the Texas law was, indeed, as described by DoodleTroll*, then the SCOTUS had little choice but to rule as they did; further, this avenue of attack on firearms rights has been active since the 1980s with little to no effect.
So Newsome is working his jaw and flapping his vocal cords without purpose.
* I admit I have not followed the SCOTUS case about the Texas abortion law, and am assuming the case and resolution is as DoodleTroll described it.
There's going to be a new twist.
If they parallel the TX law CA will make it illegal to sell handguns, say. But the state won't enforce the ban, they'll say any individual can sue a seller in civil court and if they win the suit they'll get $50k.
That's the new twist TX is using, and so far it's worked since it isn't the state enforcing the law.
I think the tactic will ultimately fail because in the long run SCOTUS won't let Constitutional rights be skirted like this, but for now Doodle's right. If it works against abortion legally it can work against any right.