Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mcenedo
It's not enough that police are too often told to withdraw from certain locales when thugs go on a rampage of looting, shooting and burning.

Next, we can expect fearless members of the news media--many of whom are unionized--to flat refuse to cover such events out of concern for their own safety. ("I'm not paid to be a war correspondent" would be not far from the truth in some gawdoffal locations.)

And watch the news directors, editors and the oh-so-woke media ownership ranks fall right in line.

After all, if one life could be saved . . .

I view withdrawal from live coverage of out-in-the-open criminal activity as the next step in censoring news that most of the American public used to trust unquestioningly.

Times have changed, on both sides of newsroom door. No longer do the national media adhere to the time-worn phrase, "If it bleeds it leads." Exceptions abound, as we saw last Sunday unless you were watching Fox.

7 posted on 11/28/2021 10:05:53 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logician2u

Eventually sane people will take matters into thier own hands and the people will applaude and support this


8 posted on 11/29/2021 2:41:53 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson