Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Those who say Kyle’s actions were vigilantism don’t know the difference between that and self-defense. They are distinct. In taking the shots he did, Kyle wasn’t enforcing laws, he was trying to keep from getting murdered.

In keeping with the left’s penchant for doing what they accuse others of doing, those attempting to disarm Kyle, “because he shouldn’t have a gun” were the vigilantes, attempting to enforce gun control laws as they understood them (wrongly).


5 posted on 11/24/2021 4:00:01 AM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan

It’s both. Kyle was only there because the PD was AWOL. Probably because they knew the FIBBERS were filming them from above.


6 posted on 11/24/2021 4:02:18 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: coloradan

Exactly right. The only actions which fit the definition of vigilantism in this event were those of Rosenbaum, Huber, Jump Kick Man and Grosskreutz, all of whom were taking the law into their own hands and imposing their own street justice for what they mistakenly thought was some kind of wrongdoing by Rittenhouse.

The only “law” Kyle was enforcing was nature’s law of self preservation, and THAT is not being a vigilante.


13 posted on 11/24/2021 4:53:57 AM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson