[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Personally, I think they should be found guilty of some degree of homicide. They were pretty much the definition of vigilantes. The wx-cop dad apparently didn’t understand that he was “ex.”

[LukeL]

I agree. If what the NY Post wrote is true this case is a complete 180 of Rittenhouse. These three decided to follow someone, make the initial contact and then escalate the situation further.

[DiogenesLamp]

Personally, I think they should be found guilty of some degree of homicide. They were pretty much the definition of vigilantes. The wx-cop dad apparently didn’t understand that he was “ex.”

I have been told by police officers in my own state that they are still considered to be sworn peace officers even after they retire. If this is true, and also true in Georgia, what does that do to your "vigilante" accusation?

And what exactly did the camera guy do to be considered part of a homicide? (And the father, who did not shoot anybody.)

Are you suggesting that following along and filming a crook running away is some sort of illegal activity?