Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns

I found out when researching this there are actually several mandates. The OSHA mandate for large business is just one of them. There is a seperate one for Federal Employees and Contractors that does not appear to be covered by the injunction against the OSHA one. It also has no 100 employee limit for subcontractors.


47 posted on 11/25/2021 7:41:18 AM PST by RainMan (Democrats ... making war against America since April 12, 1861)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: RainMan

>>> There is a seperate one for Federal Employees and Contractors that does not appear to be covered by the injunction against the OSHA one.

This reasoning assumes that the “grave constitutional concerns” mentioned by the court were not related to mandating an experimental drug on human beings, but rather for some other circumstantial aspect of the case such as # of employees or type of employer.

Hell yes it’s covered.

It SHOULD also apply to the military.

Someone needs to clarify what human rights our soldiers are giving up by serving in the armed forces.


48 posted on 11/25/2021 9:12:44 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson