Yes!
Good thought. She could come back and say, “Based on the research I did...”
And a true Karen would say, “You told us not to research THIS case. So I didn’t do that. I just researched Wisconsin law and previous legal cases and what all this meant. Oopsie!”
If she’s replaced with an alternate, we’d get (we hope!) a Packers fan gun-toting guy and they’d say NOT GUILTY across the board.
WIll see.
If the ‘tainted’ the jury deliberation with outside info... it’s a mess. More like a mistrial without prejudice.
Wisconsin State Senator Lena Taylor was outside the Kenosha courthouse today.
She pulled a Maxine Waters and implored the jury to to think of the people they (the jurors) will have to answer to based on verdict vote.
Gonna need sitting politicians to refrain from jury tampering.
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/090/838/635/original/548db37b654e9ba2.mp4
Edit: I saw this on another forum.
Any juror(s) annoyed with the self-appointed research analyst juror should ask directly, “what did you find out about the law related to our jury instructions last night?”
And a true Karen would say, “You told us not to research THIS case. So I didn’t do that. I just researched Wisconsin law and previous legal cases and what all this meant. Oopsie!”
**********************************************************
Exactly!