It’s a modified limited hangout.
It’s a modified limited hangout.
*************
A blast from the past. ;)
I think that in 2020 the Democrats had a dilemma. There are younger rocks than the top Democrats. By and large, the Democrats haven’t invested in younger talent and have, instead, clung to the reigns of power well past their best-by dates. On top of that, the group of potential candidates who applied for the top office billing were spectacularly unqualified, unlikable and unelectable. At which point the top party officials should have held a meeting and decided on a few things. What is the party’s goals, aside from holding power and feathering their onw nests? What was the path forward for the party...not the individuals like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer? Putting aside the ability to govern something more complicated than a small city with only sixty busses, which was royally cocked-up in any case, they decided to pick a man who likely wouldn’t even be alive in four years. This was a cynical attempt to keep things exactly the way they are now. Rather than planning for the future. Another problem was the big tent approach which put man eating tigers in the same tent as sexually confused sheep. Blacks and gays hate each other. Lesbians hate EVERYBODY.
With fantastic cheating and the help of Communist China, the Democrats won. But the fantasy that they’d be able to make a man whose brain is nearly dead, look presidential and rule from behind him is long over. Assuming the judges who all, wrongly in most cases, ruled against Trump, have learned from their mistakes, the next election will “mostly” be fair and the Democrats will “mostly” be eliminated...probably for a decade or more, from the public consciousness.
If the NYT is no longer on board with any particular Democrat, there’s villainy afoot that has emerged from the smoky cloakroom. He/they better resign before Arkanacide decides their fate.