Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
For the jurors, the best outcome would be mistrial with prejudice.

It would be dismissal with prejudice, wouldn't it be? I'm not sure myself but I think a dismissal is the correct term for when the prosecution brings a case that has no merit.

347 posted on 11/11/2021 3:08:56 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_Party_Animal

Some have speculated that the prosecution has blown it so badly that they are trying for a mistrial so they would get another chance. A barrister can weigh in and tell us if dismissal would be the proper thing.


349 posted on 11/11/2021 3:12:36 PM PST by doug from upland (Why the hell isn't Hillary Rodham Clinton in prison yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: GOP_Party_Animal

“It would be dismissal with prejudice, wouldn’t it be? I’m not sure myself but I think a dismissal is the correct term for when the prosecution brings a case that has no merit.”

In civil trials they have a procedure called “Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict,” which a judge can order to overrule a verdict.

I am pretty sure a judge cannot do that to a “not guilty” verdict in a criminal trial. But I think they can to a guilty verdict. It would be pretty unusual, though.


367 posted on 11/11/2021 8:29:23 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson