helpful explanation, thank you. This prosecutor sure is grasping at straws; he really has no case.
Judge is going to allow the enlarged image to come into evidence.
I don’t think the evidence is relevant. Prosecution will argue that Kyle is reckless or provoking based on equivocal image.
I think I heard prosecution say it was going to impeach Kyle’s testimony on being issued a ballistic vest, and on being enrolled in some “Arizona college.} I don’t know what Kyle’s testimony was on the college.
Those too are minor issues. We all make misunderstandings, usually hundreds a day. Somebody gave him a vest. If not official channels, so what? The college error? Who knows. Anyway, the objective is to make him out a liar in general.
“Frame average” takes multiple images and combines them into one. The final result may show something that never existed on any of the images used to make the combination.
The “deblurr” takes blurrs, tries to figiure a direction of blurring, and creates an image without the blurred pixes.
Color interpolation is a non-issue to whatever is misleading (if anything) from the frame averaging.
And my point about inferring direction of a remote tube, from one remote viewing vantage point, is literally impossible.