the vaccine has a high probability of ****not working**** because of the cancer. therefore because of the high chance of injury to the immune system and other organ systems from the vaccine itself
~~~~
Wrong. You’ve obviously not studied cancer, especially multiple myeloma, in the least. Cancer is not what old school oncologists would have you believe, a disease of genetic mutation. Cancer is a disease of cellular energy failure. In a healthy cell mRNA absorbs energy created by mitochondria and the Krebs cycle. mRNA uses the energy to tell epigenes what proteins they need from DNA. Then mRNA transfers the proteins to other organelles in the cytoplasm for further processing.
Cancer’s energy failure fails to energize mRNA adequately for it to perform any of these chores.
Now insert a vaccine of mRNA designed to elicit DNA proteins which can form COVID spike proteins. Without cellular energy these new mRNA proteins can do nothing, much less create the spike proteins they were programmed to create. mRNA vaccines would be useless in a cancerous system. Studies of mRNA vaccines on cancer patients yield a deplorable 20% efficacy rate against COVID.
Now add that multiple myeloma targets mRNA used by immune cells, and you have a perfect storm of vaccine incompetence.
“Now add that multiple myeloma targets mRNA used by immune cells, and you have a perfect storm of vaccine incompetence.”
huh? so now you’re agreeing with my point that you disagreed with earlier, that this would be a great reason to refuse the shot? becase the cancer limits the effectiveness of an already leaky vaccine? ok thanks i guess. or maybe again you have trouble reading.
anyway from the article which directly contradicts your analysis of the cancer (which i didn’t have and don’t be claim any expertise in.
“A study published in late July found that only 45% of patients with active multiple myeloma developed an “adequate” immune response after getting vaccinated with either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines.”
two points again:
powell probably wouldn’t have known about this study when he took the vaccine. too bad for him. if he had it would have been a very good reason for him to avoid the shot, which itself we now know from vaers and other sources could have very well contributed to his demise (not necessarily from the ccp virus, btw).
again it’s NOT a “perfect storm for vaccine...” as you said, because the vaccine actually works with the cancer in question in many cases (about 50/50) according to pfizer. which contradicts you and your blanket assertion about MM, once again. again i’m assuming the pfizer study was correct which is itself a big assumption.
anyway. and this is my opinion having had cancer and talked to many with with cancer of any kind, you don’t put anything in your body that you don’t have 100% confidence in it’s 1. effectiveness—that it will work as advertised and 2. safety—that it will not harm or do damage to the normal functioning of your bodies systems—all of it’s systems—and that is a holistic judgement based on your dr’s expert advice and knowledge. it’s critical to have good advice because when you’re in the disease, you’re dealing with illness and not in the best shape for doing your own research.
anyway, i’m really not clear on your point. are you just showing off your take on MM or are you addressing my general take that cancer patients in general should question taking any leaky vaccine while they have the disease? which is and was my point from the beginning. i stand by it. nothing you said convinces me otherwise. have the last word if you want.