Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jonrick46

It not a vaccine. Your mistake is confusing this new type of medial treatments with previous vaccines. Details below.. It is interesting to note that this new type of treatment has only been authorized due the political pressure of “having to do something” about Covid.

Previously RNA technology has failed every clinical trial. It was one of those neat toys scientists theorized should work but were never able to successfully get past clinical trials.

Vaccine: Per the WHO

Vaccination is a simple, safe, and effective way of protecting you against harmful diseases, before you come into contact with them. It uses your body’s natural defenses to build resistance to specific infections and makes your immune system stronger.

Vaccines train your immune system to create antibodies, just as it does when it’s exposed to a disease. However, because vaccines contain only killed or weakened forms of germs like viruses or bacteria, they do not cause the disease or put you at risk of its complications.

What is the Covid “Vaccine”

The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented pressures on drug developers. An effective and safe vaccine typically takes over a decade to create and validate, but the global impact and spread of COVID-19 accelerated the production of the first vaccines, which were rolled out less than a year after the initial outbreak of the disease.

Ultimately, a new class of vaccines based on RNA technology were the first to be approved across much of the western world. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines represent a promising alternative to manufacturing conventional vaccines due to their flexibility and rapid production speed.


55 posted on 10/19/2021 10:15:20 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Wow! I wasted my time writing my post for you. I suppose President Trump’s effort to get a vaccine at “warp speed” was a big waste of time too.

I bet you gave a thumbs up when Kamala Harris said, “I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever (a vaccine) he’s talking about. I will not take his word for it.” She was later asked if Dr. Fauci gave his approval of the vaccine’s efficacy and reliability, would she trust Dr. Fauci? and she said, “Yes. I trust Dr. Fauci,” she “would trust the word of public health experts and scientists, but not Donald Trump.”


56 posted on 10/19/2021 11:07:54 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson